Facial Reanimation

Module Summary

Facial reanimation is a beneficial procedure to help with deficits created from significant facial nerve palsies. Prior to pursuing surgical reanimation, a treatable medical etiology should be excluded. Facial nerve function should be thoroughly assessed and documented. Three primary techniques exist for nerve injury repair – primary neurorrhaphy, interposition cable graft, and nerve substitution. Primary repair is the gold standard. However, cable grafts and nerve substitutions are better suited to larger or more extensive defects. Several factors must be considered in planning the surgical approach for defect repair and maximum reanimation function. Results of reanimation can lead to dramatic improvements in quality of life. 

Module Learning Objectives 
  1. Explain how to evaluate the patient with chronic facial nerve paralysis, including confirming the etiology.
  2. Comprehensively examine a chronic facial nerve paralysis patient.
  3. Describe the approach to facial reanimation treatment options.

 

History of Facial Paralysis
  • Affected side of face
  • Affected segments of face
    • Hemi-face-- indicates unilateral pathology rather than bilateral
    • Forehead sparing – involvement of the mid and lower face with intact upper facial movement may indicate central nervous system insult or distal peripheral branch insult (e.g. parotid tumor or trauma to peripheral upper nerve branch)
    • Segmental – indicates involvement of segmental branches of facial nerve
  • Onset of symptoms
    • Date – differential diagnosis, associated work-up, and possible treatment options rely on timing since onset of paralysis
    • Progression — rate of onset can indicate etiology (e.g. Bell’s palsy onset 24-72 hours)
    • Treatment at onset – was there an initial evaluation at the time of onset, how was it managed (e.g. steroids, antiviral medications, imaging) 
  • Degree of paralysis
    • Incomplete/weakness/paresis versus complete/paralysis
    • House-Brackmann scale – tool for grading of facial nerve function 
  • Associated factors give clues to etiology and further required work-up (e.g. cranial nerve deficits, previous facial paralysis episodes)
    • Otologic symptoms – dizziness, tinnitus, otorrhea, hearing loss, changes in taste or salivation
    • Face/Ear/Neck rash (e.g. herpes vesicles) – may indicate prolonged recovery
    • Head & neck symptoms – parotid or neck mass, progression of incomplete to complete paralysis, other cranial nerve deficits
    • Atypical presentation (e.g. Bell’s palsy with onset beyond typical 24-72 hours), recurrent or bilateral paralysis, concurrent neurologic findings
Recovery of Facial Paralysis
  • Improvement in symptoms 
    • Assess the progression and degree of recovery of movement since onset 
    • Bell’s palsy should completely recover within three months
    • Recovery after vestibular schwannoma surgery with intact facial nerve may have longer recovery
  • Residual symptoms 
    • Referral is indicated in cases of new/worsening neurologic findings, ocular symptoms, or incomplete recovery after three months since onset 
  • Confirm the diagnosis if symptoms beyond three months
    • There are a variety of potential underlying etiologies, such as traumatic nerve injury, infection, autoimmune disease, vascular insult, and tumor 
    • Ancillary tests, such as CT and MRI, are helpful to rule out other diagnoses 
Chronic Facial Nerve Conditions
  • Flaccid paralysis – absent movement on the hemi-face
  • Non-flaccid paralysis – some movement present that may include:
    • Facial weakness/paresis – some movement; weakness may be segmental 
    • Synkinesis 
    • Mixed weakness/paresis & Synkinesis

Synkinesis – involuntary movements of one region of face due to voluntary/spontaneous movement in another region, which may include hyperkinesia 

  • Symptoms 
    • Often present with inability to smile due to synkinetic muscles opposing zygomatic function
    • Patients may complain of tightness, spasm, facial pain
  • Examination 
    • Discoordinated musculature
      • E.g. eye closure with attempted mouth movements
    • Hypercontracted musculature
      • Distortion from asymmetrically increased muscular tone  
    • Mixed – examine each segment for weakness also present
  • Early interventional options before synkinesis develops
    • Eye protection (see Ocular Management of Incomplete Eye Closure)
    • Refrain from maximal-effort exercises of facial muscles which may worsen asymmetry (i.e. strengthens other muscles)
    • Avoid electrical stimulation – attempted stimulation of paretic area may result in abnormal movements
  • Interventional options to treat synkinesis 
    • Chemodenervation injections – temporary inhibition of synkinetic musculature 
      • Most commonly Botox therapy to synkinetic musculature
      • Can use small quantities on contralateral muscles for improvement in symmetry  
    • Neuromuscular retraining therapy
      • Facial training may improve expression through muscle coordination
      • Often administered by occupational therapist 
    • Selective neurolysis surgery or muscle excision 
      • Inhibition of synkinetic musculature through direct muscle excision or removal of neural input

** Remember that synkinesis can co-exist with nerve palsy and impact facial distortion.**

Comprehensive Facial Nerve Examination of Chronic Facial Paralysis

Documentation

  • Photography – static evaluation of face at rest and showing muscle strength
    • At rest, eyebrow raise, gentle & strong eye closure, gentle & teeth-baring smiles, pursed lips, depressed lower lip, snarl 
  • Video – dynamic evaluation of muscle coordination 
    • Eyebrow raise, gentle & strong eye closure, teeth-baring smile, pursed lips, snarl 

Zonal Analysis – useful method to evaluate each facial segment in insolation in consideration of reanimation 


Zone 1 – brow 
Zone 2 – ocular region 
Zone 3 – midface & nasolabial fold 
Zone 4 – oral commissures 
Zone 5 – lower lip

Figure 1. Zones of face for facial nerve function analysis.

 

Measures

  • Clinician examination instruments
    • House-Brackmann 
      • Graded on scale of 1 to 6 
      • Widely accepted worldwide and reproducible 

 

Grade Function Gross At Rest Motion
I

Normal in all areas

Normal Normal Normal forehead, eyes, & mouth
II Mild dysfunction Slight weakness on close inspection Normal symmetry and tone Forehead: moderate to good
Eye: complete closure with minimum effort
Mouth: slight asymmetry
III Moderate dysfunction Obvious, non-disfiguring difference between sides Normal symmetry and tone Forehead: slight to moderate 
Eye: complete closure with effort
Mouth: slightly weak with maximum effort
IV Moderately severe dysfunction Obvious weakness and/or disfiguring asymmetry Normal symmetry and tone Forehead: none 
Eye: incomplete closure
Mouth: asymmetric movement with maximum effort
V Severe dysfunction Only barely perceptible motion Symmetry Forehead: none
Eye: incomplete closure
Mouth: slight movement
VI Total paralysis No movement No movement No movement

 

  • Sunnybrook Facial Grading System – comprised of three sub-scores
    • Resting Symmetry
    • Symmetry of Voluntary Movement
    • Synkinesis
  • eFACE – three components, each composed of four facial functions
    • Static parameters
    • Dynamic parameters
    • Synkinesis parameters

 

  • Patient reported outcome measures
    • Facial Clinimetric evaluation (FaCE) scale
    • Facial Disability Index (FDI)
    • Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ)
    • Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale
    • Depression and anxiety measures (e.g. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Beck Depression Inventory)
    • Global quality of life measures (e.g. Short Form 36 [SF36])

 

 

 

 

Ocular Management of Incomplete Eye Closure Care (Acute and Chronic Paralysis)
  • Wrap-around sunglasses
  • Frequent lubrication (e.g. Optive)
  • Ophthalmic ointment (e.g. Lacrilube)
  • Nighttime moisture chamber 
  • Eye taping
  • Suture tarsorrhaphy 
Reanimation Treatment Planning: Pre-Operative
  • Patient age and health
    • Insight into risks of procedure and factors that may complicate recovery
    • Cardiac co-morbidities, immunosuppression, slower nerve regeneration   
  • Etiology & prognosis of underlying cause
    • Life expectancy
    • E.g. a patient with Bell’s palsy paresis is more likely to experience higher grade of recovery than one with a nerve transection and primary repair
  • Patient goals
    • Determining which function the patient prioritizes (e.g. spontaneous smile) guides the operative techniques that are more beneficial 
    • Should be balanced to clinician goals (e.g. ocular health)
  • Length of time since onset 
    • Minimum debate in the literature at this time to intervene with reanimation surgery in patient with delayed recovery 
      • EMG testing can elucidate muscle unit recovery function
    • Longer duration related to atrophy of muscles, more below
  • Site of nerve disruption – What nerve will drive the face? (see below)
  • Working muscle unit – What will move the face?
    • Determine status of original musculature 
      • Irreversible atrophy warrants donor muscle transfer
      • Significant time since initial insult is associated with poorer outcomes, i.e. more than two years after insult 
        • EMG testing can elucidate muscle unit function
    • Determine donor muscle and neural and vascular input if original not available
      • Local muscle transfer
      • Free tissue transfer
        • Contrast imaging can aid in determining viability of donor tissue, e.g. neck vessels
Reanimation Operative Options based on Nerve & Muscle Status

For Intact Musculature: Nerve Transfer Reanimation Options

  • Intact Proximal Nerve & Distal Nerve (e.g. main trunk disruptions)
    • Primary neurorrhaphy
      • Primary suture repair gold standard
      • Proximal peripheral nerve attachment to distal nerve or branches
    • Cable graft 
      • Best for large defects between distal and proximal nerve ends
      • Common donor nerve grafts – greater auricular nerve & sural nerve
  • Unavailable Proximal Nerve, Intact Distal Nerve (e.g. brainstem lesion)
    • Nerve substitution indicated if main trunk of the facial nerve is damaged or unavailable for graft, but distal nerves and corresponding muscles are viable
    • Requires coaptation of other motor nerves 
      • Common ipsilateral donor nerves – masseteric, hypoglossal, cross-face nerve graft 
      • Contralateral donor nerve to intact distal nerve (i.e. cross face nerve graft)
    • Note: These motor nerves also used when main trunk of the facial nerve is damaged/unavailable and musculature is NOT intact. Donor motor nerves drive free tissue transfer

For Non-Intact Musculature: Muscle Transfer Reanimation Options

  • Static reconstruction versus Dynamic Reanimation 
    • Dynamic reanimation reestablishes voluntary contractile muscle 
      • Goal: achieve smile either spontaneous with cross face nerve graft or with purposeful activation (e.g. biting or tongue movement)
      • Best suited for optimal smile restoration 
    • Dynamic muscle options when native musculature non-intact (see below)
      • Regional muscle transfer
      • Free muscle transfer with nerve transfer 
    • Static reconstruction procedures aim to optimize suspension of facial structures, 
      • Goals are to improve oral competence, eye closure, facial symmetry at rest, minimize synkinesis and mass movement 
      • Best suited for upper face rehabilitation, midface tissue resuspension, or for those with inability to tolerate larger procedures 
      • Often performed in conjunction with dynamic reanimation procedures. 
      • Examples: upper eyelid weighting and lid procedures; fascia lata sling for nasolabial fold elevation; also for external nasal valve collapse
  • Free tissue transfer versus regional transfer 
    • Free flap candidates have reasonable life expectancy without significant comorbidities 
      • Common harvest sites – gracilis muscle (most common), pectoralis minor muscle, latissimus dorsi muscle 
      • Common nerve donors 
        • Split hypoglossal – significant tongue morbidity, synkinesis, poor 
        • Masseteric/Trigeminal nerve – easy volitional triggering, low donor site morbidity, good oral commissure excursion; mastication-triggered activation
        • Cross-facial nerve graft – used with autologous long sural nerve graft; achieves good resting tone, only technique that provides emotive smile; less commissure excursion, blink-triggered activation
    • Regional pedicled flap sites allow for dynamic reanimation of non-intact native musculature without need for separate donor nerve
      • Temporalis muscle – reliable anatomy and vasculature, minimizes hollowing of temporal region; results in possible alopecia of harvest site; relatively contraindicated in edentulous, preoperative wasting, and trigeminal dysfunction 
Adjunctive Surgical Procedures
  • Eye protection (see Ocular Management of Incomplete Eye Closure)
    • Key in early phase of intervention to protect and lubricate cornea
  • Browlift
    • Used in late phase of intervention for lack of reanimation of upper face 
    • Indications for functional visual obstruction or gross asymmetry
  • Facelift, Midface-lift 
    • Used in late phase of intervention for partial or total hemi-face elevation to create improved symmetry
    • May also improve mastication 
Review Questions
  1. What are some medical etiologies necessitating evaluation in new onset facial nerve paresis or paralysis?
  2. How many zones of the face require analysis? What are the zones?
  3. What can lead to facial distortion when nerve palsy does not fully account for deficits?
  4. Which repair option is ideal for a small defect that is under moderate tension?
  5. Which technique in reanimation produces the best spontaneous smile?
References
  1. Gaudin, R.A., Robinson, M., Banks, C.A. Baiungo, J., Jowett, N., Hadlock, T.A. (2016). Emerging vs Time-Tested Methods of Facial Grading Among Patients With Facial Paralysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 18(4): 251-257.
  2. Kim, J. (2016). Neural Reanimation Advances and New Technologies. Facial Plastic Surg Clin N Am. 24: 71-84. 
  3. Jowett, N & Hadlock, T.A. (2015) A Contemporary Approach to Facial Reanimation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 17(4): 293-300.